Legal Opinion

East v. Oosting

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided September 10, 1965No. Civ. A. 4798, 4976PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTER E. HOFFMAN, Chief Judge.

In substantially identical actions each of petitioners seeks a trial de novo on the jurisdictional issue, and further requests the entry of an order setting aside the findings of the respondent Deputy Commissioner, which were to the effect that the injury in each case did not occur upon the navigable waters of the United States within the meaning of the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act.

The two cases have not been consolidated for trial or hearing, but the governing principles in each case are essentially the same and are the subject of this…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. O'Leary v. Brown-Pacific-Maxon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Calbeck v. Travelers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Swanson v. Marra Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. O'Keeffe v. Smith, Hinchman & Grylls Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. American Export Lines, Inc. v. RevelCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1959

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Nacirema Operating Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. United States v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. The Travelers Insurance Company and Levingston Shipbuilding Company v. R. J. Shea, Deputy Commissioner, and James D. McColloughCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  4. Green v. Pope & Talbott, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1971
  5. Lisenby v. Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API