Legal Opinion

Ginsberg v. Wineman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1946No. Docket No. 2, Calendar No. 43,081PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.

Plaintiff Abraham Ginsberg was an employee of his son, Morris Ginsberg, who rented a store and basement at 12226 Dexter Boulevard, Detroit, from defendant Andrew Wineman. In the written lease dated February 28,1941, it was agreed that the tenant should “keep at his own expense during the continuance of this lease, the said premises and every part thereof in good repair.” The lease also provided that the lessor should have “the right to enter upon said premises at all reasonable hours for the purpose of inspecting the same, and in order to prevent waste, loss or destruction, may make such…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Peerless Manufacturing Co. v. BagleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Rhoades v. SeidelMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Sorenson v. Kalamazoo Auto Sales Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mobil Oil Corp. v. ThornMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Roesler v. Liberty Nat. Bank of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1954
  3. Huey v. BartonMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Froede v. Holland Ladder & Manufacturing Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. William B. Schultz, and Cross-Appellant v. Tecumseh Products, a Corporation, and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API