Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Froede v. Holland Ladder & Manufacturing Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 3, 1994No. Docket No. 143336Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Holbrook, Jr., J.

(concurring in part and dissenting in part). I concur with Judge Jansen’s analysis and holding that a former felon’s civil right to serve as a juror is restored once that person’s sentence is completed. I further concur in *139the procedure established for timely challenges to the qualifications or competence of a prospective juror under either MCL 600.1307a; MSA 27A.1307(1) or MCR 2.511(D)(1) or (D)(2). I respectfully disagree, however, that reversal for a new trial is warranted in this case.

A party has a right and a duty to discover from juror questionnaires or on voir dire…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. Randy MetzgerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
  3. Grist v. Upjohn CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. Citizens Commercial & Savings Bank v. EngbergMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. Kwaiser v. PetersMichigan Supreme Court · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API