Legal Opinion

Oneida State Bank v. Peterson

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 25, 1918No. Gen. No. 6,574PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Knox county; the Hon. Harry M. Waggoner, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the April term, 1918.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Niehaus

This is an action of assumpsit commenced in the Circuit Court of Knox county by the appellant, Oneida State Bank, against the appellees, C. A. Peterson, S. J. Metcalf, Thomas D. Murdoch and Balph W. Field, who are sued as surviving partners of the firm of S. J. Metcalf & Company. The action was brought to recover on a promissory note for the sum of $3,323.58, alleged to have been made and delivered to the appellant for a partnership indebtedness due to the appellant bank. The note sued upon was signed for the partnership and in the name of the partnership by the appellee, S. J. Metcalf, and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hartrich v. HawesIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  2. First National Bank v. Lake Erie & Western RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  3. People ex rel. Boos v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Herricks v. Chicago & Eastern Illinois RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Indiana, Decatur & Western Railway Co. v. HendrianIllinois Supreme Court · 1901

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Oneida State Bank v. PetersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API