Oneida State Bank v. Peterson

Mr. Presiding Justice Jones

delivered the opinion of the court.

A statement of this case will be found in the opinion of this court in Oneida State Bank v. Peterson, 211 Ill. App. 655. It is therefore unnecessary for us to restate the facts there stated. After the cause was redocketed in the circuit court, a trial was had before a jury. The court gave a peremptory instruction at the conclusion of all of the evidence offered on behalf of the plaintiff to find a verdict in favor of the defendants. Judgment was entered on the directed verdict and the cause is again before us on appeal.

After the…