Legal Opinion
Hofer v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided August 20, 2019No. 3:18-cv-01991Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WILLIAM HOFER AND KAY HOFER, Case No.: 3:18-cv-01991-AJB-BLM 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S 13 v. MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED 14 WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, COMPLAINT INC., a Delaware corporation, and DOES 15 1-10, inclusive, (Doc. No. 17) 16 Defendant. 17 18 19 Presently before the Court is Defendant Wright Medical Technology, Inc.’s 20 (“Defendant”) motion to dismiss Plaintiffs William and Kay Hofer’s (“Plaintiffs”) first 21 amended complaint. (Doc. No. 17.) Plaintiffs oppose the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Kearns v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Vess v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.