Piszel v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
Rule 12(b)(1); Subject-Matter Jurisdiction; Rule 12(b)(6); Failure to State a Claim; Fifth Amendment Takings; Illegal Exaction.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
LYDIA KAY GRIGGSBY, Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff, Anthony Piszel, brought this action alleging an illegal exaction and contract-based takings of his severance compensation under an employment agreement with the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, in violation of the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution. The government has moved to dismiss plaintiff’s claims for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Piszel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Land of Lincoln Mutual Health Insurance Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Bracken v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
- Brandenburg v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025
- Flint v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.