Legal Opinion
Piszel v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided August 18, 2016No. 2015-5100PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Dyk, Circuit Judge.
Mr. Anthony Piszel appeals from a judgment of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“the Claims Court”) dismissing his complaint against the United States for failure to state a claim. That complaint alleged a taking and illegal exaction resulting from a statute and regulations barring the payment of so-called “golden parachute” compensation upon his termination as an employee of the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“Freddie Mac”). Because we agree that Mr. Piszel’s complaint fails to state a claim on which relief can be granted, we affirm.
Background
I
The…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Concrete Pipe & Products of Cal., Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Perry Capital LLC v. MnuchinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Land of Lincoln Mutual Health Insurance Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Perry Capital LLC v. Steven MnuchinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah & Ouray Indian v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2024
- Silver Buckle Mines, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.