Legal Opinion

Mullins v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided September 23, 1924PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Clay

— Affirming.

Appellant was convicted of the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor, and asks a reversal on the ground that the only evidence of his guilt was obtained by an illegal search of his premises.

As appellant did not object to the evidence or move its exclusion, but merely requested a peremptory instruction which challenged the sufficiency of the evidence and not its admissibility, the error, if any, is not available on appeal. Elmore v. Commonwealth, 201 Ky. 427, 257 S. W. 32; Sorrels v. Commonwealth, 197 Ky. 761, 248 S. W. 205.

Judgment affirmed.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sorrels v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  2. Elmore v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Scott v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  2. Dotson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  3. Koehler v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  4. McDermott v. Byrley Supply CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  5. Kaiser v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1925

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API