Legal Opinion

Pastir v. Bielski

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 17, 1978PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiffs, heirs-at-law of Helen Bielski, deceased, appealed to the Superior Court from the admission of the decedent’s will to probate. They claimed that the testatrix “lacked sufficient testamentary capacity to make and execute a [w]ill” and that the will was the product of undue influence exerted upon the testatrix by the defendant, Frank Bielski. The trial court found the will to be invalid and, from the judgment rendered, the defendant, proponent of the will, appealed to this court.

In its finding, the trial court concluded that “[t]he testatrix did not possess the requisite…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pappas v. PappasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  2. Palmer v. ReevesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  3. Heiser v. Morgan Guaranty Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
  4. Livingston's Appeal From ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
  5. Berkeley v. BerkeleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Milford Employees Ass'n v. City of MilfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  2. Satti v. RagoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  3. Stanton v. GrigleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  4. Gaudet v. Safeco InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  5. Hartford National Bank & Trust Co. v. TuckerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API