Legal Opinion

Serijanian v. Associated Material & Supply Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 28, 1967No. Docket 36PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtT. G. Kavanagh, J.

The plaintiffs purchased a brick veneer house from defendant Zylstra in July, 1956. In the spring of 1957, the bricks began to chip, crack, flake and otherwise disintegrate. Although repair was attempted, it was discontinued because all the bricks were deteriorating and would require complete replacement. The defect was that the bricks absorbed too much water, which caused them to decompose after freezing and thawing.

Defendant Zylstra constructed the house and lived in it for 2 years, He had purchased the defective bricks from defendant Associated, which in turn had purchased them from…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Piercefield v. Remington Arms Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Spence v. Three Rivers Builders & Masonry Supply, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Hill v. Harbor Steel & Supply Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Bommer v. StedelinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1951
  5. Bonner v. AmesMichigan Supreme Court · 1959

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cova v. Harley Davidson Motor Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  2. Leno v. EhliNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Sharon Proos Kosters v. The Seven-Up Company, & Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  4. Kapalczynski v. Globe Construction Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. Knoper v. BurtonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API