New Process Steel, L. P. v. National Labor Relations Board
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stevens
The Taft-Hartley Act, enacted in 1947, increased the size of the National Labor Relations Board (Board) from three members to five. See 29 U. S. C. § 153(a). Concurrent with that change, the Taft-Hartley Act amended § 3(b) of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) to increase the quorum requirement for the Board from two members to three, and to allow the Board to delegate its authority to groups of at least three members. See § 153(b). The question in this case is whether, following a delegation of the Board’s powers to a three-member group, two members may continue to exercise that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Market Co. v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Nguyen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Laurel Baye Healthcare of Lake Lanier, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by173 opinions
- United States v. NeradCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2010
- Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. CanningSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- D.R. Horton, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
- Canning v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
- Rudin v. MylesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
168 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.