Legal Opinion

Jasper v. Brinckerhoff

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 2008No. S-07-0124PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Justice.

[¶ 1] Appellant, Zina Jasper (Jasper) filed a complaint on August 4, 2006, seeking to set aside what she deemed a fraudulent conveyance of real property, made by her former husband and Appellee herein, Burton Field Brinckerhoff (Brinckerhoff). Jasper and Brinckerhoff were divorced in the state of New York by decree entered on June 10, 1986. Under the terms of that divorce, Brinckerhoff was to pay Jasper alimony until she remarried or died. In her complaint, Jasper averred that while the two parties were in litigation over past due alimony, as well as attorney’s fees awards…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Chepstow Limited v. Marshall B. HuntCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  2. Ekberg v. SharpWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Molitor v. MolitorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  4. First National Bank v. EastmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Abraham v. Great Western Energy, LLCWyoming Supreme Court · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Strandlien v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Busch v. HORTON AUTOMATICS, INC.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  3. JonMichael Guy v. Robert Lampert, Wyoming Department of Corrections Director, and Steve Hargett, Wyoming Medium Correctional Institution WardenWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Smith v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Gunnett v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API