Legal Opinion

Jeurissen v. Amisub, Inc.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 22, 1990No. 54A01-8911-CV-446PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTSON, Judge.

The plaintiffs-appellants Connie Jeuris-sen and Judy Consoer separately filed their notice of claim in the Montgomery County Court seeking payment of a bonus, statutory damages and attorney's fees. After a bench trial, judgment was rendered in favor of Jeurissen and Consoer for the amount of the bonus only. The defendant-appellee Amisub, Inc., d/b/a Culver Union Hospital (Hospital), had been the former employer of Jeurissen and Consoer who were nurses.

The two causes were consolidated for the purpose of filing a motion to correct errors which was denied. The appeal was taken…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Die & Mold, Inc. v. WesternIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Baesler's Super-Valu v. Indiana Commissioner of Labor Ex Rel. BenderIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Fardy v. Physicians Health Rehabilitation Services, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Wilson v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1985

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Prime Mortgage USA, Inc. v. NicholsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Timothy Herremans v. Carrera Designs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  3. Gurnik v. LeeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Wank v. Saint Francis CollegeIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Pyle v. National Wine & Spirits Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API