United States Tire Co. v. Kirk
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Reno district court; Frank F. PRIGG, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the'court was delivered by
Mason, J.:
The United States Tire Company sued a partnership known as the Hutchinson Motor Car Company for the balance due upon an account. The defendants resisted the claim on the ground that a settlement had been effected by the constructive delivery in satisfaction thereof of a quantity of automobile casings and tubes. A judgment in favor of the defendants, based upon that theory, was affirmed by this court. (Tire Co. v. Kirk, 97 Kan. 531, 159 Pac. 392.) After that decision the plaintiff made a demand for the goods referred to, which, although…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Marbourg v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
- Grentner v. FehrenschieldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
- Akin v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
- Carbondale Investment Co. v. BurdickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
- Chase v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1905
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Nelson v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
- Sluss v. Brown-Crummer Investment Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1933
- Ablah v. EymanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961
- Brooks v. WeikSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
- Bratton v. Exchange State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.