Legal Opinion

People v. Brower

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 13, 1990PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On the instant appeal, the defendant argues that the court committed reversible error in its instruction to the jury with regard to the defendant’s failure to testify. We agree.

In its instruction on this issue, the court stated: "The law has given him the right in effect to say to the Prosecution prove your case against me. It is my judgment that the situation is such that I am not bound to take the witness stand. And the law gives me that right. And the law gives me that privilege”. This instruction not only exceeded the "plain and simple language of CPL 300.10 (2)” (People v Morris, 129…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. AhmedNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. People v. McLucasNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
  3. People v. ThomasNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. People v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. People v. BettsNew York Court of Appeals · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. ChambersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. People v. BrowerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. People v. BrowerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API