Legal Opinion

Cass v. Brown

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 5, 1894PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Grafton,

June, 1894.

At common law no right passes by a release but that which the releasor has at the time.

If money be paid to an heir at law who, upon receipt thereof, relinquishes all interest in the estate, the transaction will be deemed an advancement, in the absence of evidence that it was intended as a loan or gift.

Appeal, from a decree of the judge of probate disallowing the plaintiff’s claim to a distributive share of the estate of Jonas G. Brown, who died intestate October 2, 1889, and was survived by his widow, a son, a daughter, and the plaintiff the only child of a deceased…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Ryan v. . WardNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  3. Quarles v. QuarlesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1808
  4. Ensworth v. DavenportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1832

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Robinson v. RamseySupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
  2. Pylant v. BurnsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  3. Steinfield v. Monadnock MillsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1923
  4. Crider v. City Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  5. Estate of CloutierSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API