Oscar M. Ulmann, Administrator-With Will Annexed of the Estate of Oscar Ulmann, Deceased v. Sunset-Mckee Company, a Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge.
This is a diversity case. Plaintiff-appellant, Oscar M. Ulmann, is a citizen of California as was the testator, Oscar Ul- mann, whom Osear M. represents as administrator-with-the-will annexed. The defendant-appellee, Sunset-McKee Company, is organized under the laws of the State of Delaware and does business in California. The amount in controversy ■is just over $3,000.
■ To make it clear which “Ulmann” is meant, the decedent, Oscar Ulmann, a former employee of the defendant company, is referred to as “Sr.” and his administrator,' Oscar M. Ulmann as “Jr.,” although…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Schumm v. BergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Howard v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Brawley v. Crosby Research Foundation, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1946
- Chrisman v. Southern California Edison Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
- Trower v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
3Cited by14 opinions
- Stopford v. Boonton Molding Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
- Langer v. Iowa Beef Packers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
- Hayes v. Plantations Steel Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1982
- Parsley v. Wyoming Automotive CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 1964
- David E. Boswell, an Individual, D/B/A Boswell Construction Company, and United Pacific Insurance Company v. G. F. ChapelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.