Legal Opinion

Oscar M. Ulmann, Administrator-With Will Annexed of the Estate of Oscar Ulmann, Deceased v. Sunset-Mckee Company, a Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 14, 1955No. 13983PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge.

This is a diversity case. Plaintiff-appellant, Oscar M. Ulmann, is a citizen of California as was the testator, Oscar Ul- mann, whom Osear M. represents as administrator-with-the-will annexed. The defendant-appellee, Sunset-McKee Company, is organized under the laws of the State of Delaware and does business in California. The amount in controversy ■is just over $3,000.

■ To make it clear which “Ulmann” is meant, the decedent, Oscar Ulmann, a former employee of the defendant company, is referred to as “Sr.” and his administrator,' Oscar M. Ulmann as “Jr.,” although…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schumm v. BergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Howard v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Brawley v. Crosby Research Foundation, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. Chrisman v. Southern California Edison Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
  5. Trower v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Stopford v. Boonton Molding Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
  2. Langer v. Iowa Beef Packers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
  3. Hayes v. Plantations Steel Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1982
  4. Parsley v. Wyoming Automotive CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 1964
  5. David E. Boswell, an Individual, D/B/A Boswell Construction Company, and United Pacific Insurance Company v. G. F. ChapelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API