Legal Opinion
David E. Boswell, an Individual, D/B/A Boswell Construction Company, and United Pacific Insurance Company v. G. F. Chapel
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 19, 1961No. 6775_1PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHRISTENSON, District Judge.
In this Miller Act 1 case the sole question is the interpretation of a subcontract which the prime contractor, David E. Boswell, asserts obligated the subcontractor, G. F. Chapel, to pay for “protective services” furnished by the Atchison, Topeka, and Santa Fe Railway Company. The appellant Boswell 2 and the appellee Chapel hereinafter will be referred to by their surnames, and the railway company as such.
This action initially was brought against Boswell by the United States of America for the use and benefit of the railway company to recover the cost of protecting…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hurd v. Illinois Bell Telephone CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1955
- Seybold v. Western Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Fanderlik-Locke Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
- East & West Ins. Co. of New Haven, Conn. v. FidelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
- Hulda Elizabeth Evensen, and Edward Colton Evensen v. Pubco Petroleum Corporation, Formerly Pubco Development, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Harrison Western Corporation, a Florida Corporation v. Gulf Oil Company, a Pennsylvania CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
- Schultz & Lindsay Construction Co. v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
- Saturn Oil and Gas Company, a Corporation v. Northern Natural Gas Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
- C. H. Codding & Sons v. Armour And CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
- United States v. Richard H. RamsdellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.