Legal Opinion

United States v. Alfredo Ortega-Ascanio

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 15, 2004No. 03-50096PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BREYER, District Judge:

This appeal asks us to decide whether a defendant establishes a “fair and just reason” for withdrawing a plea when he seeks to withdraw his plea before sentencing so that he can move to dismiss his indictment based on an intervening United States Supreme Court decision. In the circumstances of this case, we answer yes.

Appellant Alfredo Ortega-Ascanio pled guilty to illegal reentry. After his guilty plea, but before sentencing, the Supreme Court decided INS v. St. Cyr, 533 U.S. 289, 121 S.Ct. 2271, 150 L.Ed.2d 347 (2001). St. Cyr held that the Antiterrorism and Effective…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. United States v. Edward Alan GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. United States v. Clifford A. Davis, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  3. United States v. CaramadreCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
  4. United States v. MaysCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  5. Dung Tri Vo v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API