Legal Opinion

In Re Mh2015-003266

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 8, 2016No. 1 CA-MH 15-0084PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CATTANI, Judge:

¶ 1 Patient appeals the superior court’s order committing him for involuntary mental health treatment. Patient argues that, because he did not receive a statutorily required physical examination as part of his psychiatric evaluations, the involuntary treatment order is invalid. In light of a 2012 statutory change authorizing a third-party to complete (or attempt) the physical examination portion of the psychiatric evaluation, and for reasons that follow, we affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶ 2 In March 2015, Patient accosted several neighbors, kicked in several…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re Maricopa County Superior Court Number MH 2001-001139Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  2. In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County of Mental Health Case No. MH 94-00592Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  3. In Re the Appeal in Pima County Mental Health Service Action No. MH-1140-6-93.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  4. In Re Pinal County Mental Health No. Mh-201000029Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  5. In Re Mh-2008-000867Arizona Supreme Court · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re: Mh2020-003246Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API