Legal Opinion

Kleinknecht v. City of Evansville

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 11, 1965No. 19,804Published

1Opinion

*365On Petition for Rehearing

Martin, J.

The appellants having filed their petition for rehearing, the appellee filed its motion to dismiss appellants’ petition for rehearing on the ground that it does not comply with Rule 2-22 of the Rules of the Supreme Court.

This rule in part states that:.

“Application for a rehearing of any cause shall be made by petition, separate from, the briefs, . . . stating concisely the reasons why the decisión is thought to be erroneous. Such application may, if desired be supported by briefs. . . .” (Our emphasis).

The appellants’ petition for rehearing comprises eight…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Miller, Etc. v. Ortman, Etc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Estate of McClain v. McClainIndiana Court of Appeals · 1962
  3. Automobile Underwriters, Inc. v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Guthrie v. BLAKELYIndiana Court of Appeals · 1955
  5. MARYLAND CASUALTY CO. ETC. v. WeissIndiana Court of Appeals · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API