Legal Opinion

Canady v. McLeod

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 16, 1994No. 9310SC3PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCRODDEN, Judge. ■

Plaintiff assigns error to the trial court’s granting of summary judgment for defendant Capers. We have reviewed plaintiff’s arguments and affirm the trial court.

A trial court may grant a motion for summary judgment only when there is no genuine issue as to any material fact, and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1A-1, Rule 56(c) (1990); Ballenger v. Crowell, 38 N.C. App. 50, 53, 247 S.E.2d 287, 290 (1978). Where a case involves either (1) a claim or defense which is utterly baseless in fact or (2) a controversy on a question of law on…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kessing v. National Mortgage CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Woodson v. RowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  3. Ballenger v. CrowellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  4. Sorrells v. M.Y.B. Hospitality VenturesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  5. Olympic Products Co. v. Roof Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Kinsey v. SpannCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  2. Kiriakos v. Phillips Dankos v. StapfCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
  3. Raymond Dayle Rowsey v. R.C. Lee, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
  4. Mein Ex Rel. Mein v. CookCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  5. Lilley v. Blue Ridge Electric Membership Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API