Legal Opinion

Danciger v. State

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1942No. 7979PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Alexander

The original opinion rendered by us in the above cause, of date October 21, 1942, is withdrawn, and this opinion is substituted therefor.

This is a delinquent tax suit. The State of Texas brought the suit for itself and on behalf of Hudspeth County, El Paso-Hudspeth Counties Road District, and School Districts One and Two of Hudspeth County, against Jack Danciger and J. W. Farley to recover delinquent taxes for the years 1930 to 1939, inclusive, on 24,643 acres of land in Hudspeth County, together with penalties, interest, and costs. Farley, a non-resident of the State, was cited by…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Teague v. FairchildTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  2. Bailey v. BlockTexas Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Roberts v. ConnelleeTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Taylor v. DoomCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906
  5. Ryan v. RaleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Clint Independent School District v. Cash Investments, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. City of Marlin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
  3. Watts v. City of El PasoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
  4. Ford v. WiedCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  5. Cash Investments, Inc. v. Clint Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API