Legal Opinion

Clint Independent School District v. Cash Investments, Inc.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1998No. 97-0309PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaker, Justice

We consider whether a third-party bid at a tax foreclosure sale must comply with the Tax Code’s minimum bid requirement and the trial court’s foreclosure judgment and the order of sale for title in the property to pass to the bidder. We hold that the bid must comply. Because the court of appeals held otherwise, we reverse the court of appeals’ judgment and render judgment for Clint I.S.D.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

A. Clint I.S.D.’s Tax Foreclosure Suit

From 1980 to 1989, Clint I.S.D. assessed taxes against six tracts of land. The property owner did not pay the assessed taxes. Clint I.S.D.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Barr v. BernhardTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Mills v. PittsTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Brown v. BonougliTexas Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Carr v. Hunt, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1983
  5. Volunteer Council of Denton State School, Inc. v. Berry, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Meritor Automotive, Inc. v. Ruan Leasing Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Steak & Ale of Texas, Inc. v. BornemanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2002
  3. Sani v. Powell, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2005
  4. Entex v. Railroad Com'n of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000
  5. Wichita County v. BonninCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2008

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API