Legal Opinion

State v. Lougee

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided September 30, 1993No. 92-424PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrock, C.J.

The defendant, Kevin Lougee, was convicted of driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, second of*636fense, after a jury trial in the Superior Court (Flynn, J.). On appeal, he argues that the State failed to offer sufficient evidence at trial to prove that he had been previously convicted of driving under the influence. We agree with the defendant and remand.

On October 23,1990, the defendant was arrested and charged with driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, second offense, under RSA 265:82 (1982) and RSA 265:82-b (1982 & Supp. 1990) (amended 1991). At trial,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. MurraySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
  2. State v. EvansSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
  3. State v. CardinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
  4. State v. EbeltSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
  2. State v. CallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
  3. State v. MarcouxSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
  4. State v. PloofSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API