Legal Opinion

State v. Thompson

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 21, 2012No. 2011-373PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConboy, J.

Following a bench trial in the Lebanon District Court (drone, J.), the defendant, Daniel C. Thompson, was convicted of driving while intoxicated (DWI), see RSA 265-A:2,1 (Supp. 2012) (amended 2012), and was sentenced to enhanced penalties for a third offense. See RSA 265-A:18, IV(b) (Supp. 2012) (amended 2012). On appeal, he argues that the trial court erred in sentencing him for a third DWI offense because the State failed to submit evidence of his two prior convictions in its case-in-chief. We affirm.

The following facts are drawn from the record. The defendant was arrested and charged with…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. State v. EtienneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
  4. State v. LangillSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
  5. State v. LeBaronSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2020
  2. State v. GagneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
  3. State of New Hampshire v. Armando LisasuainSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015
  4. State of New Hampshire v. Matthew L. TsopasSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
  5. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API