Legal Opinion
State v. Murray
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided August 11, 1987No. 86-239PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSouter, J.
In this appeal from his class B felony arson conviction, see RSA 634:1, III, the defendant argues that the Superior Court (Nadeau, J.) erred in failing to dismiss the indictment, either as a remedy for the destruction of material evidence or because of the insufficiency of the evidence to prove guilt. We affirm.
At all relevant times Arlene and Jeffrey Foster owned real estate in New Durham, on which, prior to September, 1983, there stood a vacant house and barn, known as Hill Farm. From the evidence at the defendant’s trial the jury could have found that Clarence and Barbara Jenness drove…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- United States v. Carlton E. Bryant, United States of America v. William E. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- Ouellette v. BlanchardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
- United States v. Richard J. PicarielloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. LaudarowiczSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
- State v. GiordanoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- State v. GruberSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
- State v. GuaySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
- State v. O'NeillSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.