Legal Opinion

Julie Traywick v. Veikko Juhola, United States of America

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided January 30, 1991No. 90-7512PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

Julie Traywick appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment and dismissal of her suit alleging that the negligence of her supervisor, Veikko Juhola, caused certain eye injuries. Finding that the exclusivity provision of the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act (“LHWCA”), 33 U.S.C.A. § 933(i) (West 1986), bars Traywick's action, we affirm.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In June, 1987, appellant worked at the Fort Rucker, Alabama, Golf Course. The golf course is a nonappropriated fund instrumentality (“NAFI”). 1 Following the directions of her supervisor, Veikko…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Donna H. Chauncey Wilder v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
  2. Albert M. Lipscomb v. United States of America, Manuel Lujan, Jr., Secretary of the Interior, Amoco Production CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  3. Doris M. Calder v. Max D. Crall and Sgt. Terry L. EarlCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mizenko v. Electric Motor & Contracting Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1992
  2. Wreath v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1995
  3. Gibbs v. Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co.Newport News County Circuit Court · 2010
  4. Mizenko v. Electric Motor & Contracting Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1992
  5. Sun Terminals, Inc. v. Maximo PoloCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API