Legal Opinion

MacBride v. Schoen

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 29, 1932No. Docket No. 524PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

This is an action against a notary and the surety upon her notarial bond to recover damages alleged to have been suffered through the making of a false certificate of acknowledgment. A demurrer to the second amended complaint, filed by the surety, was sustained without leave to amend and from a judgment which followed in favor of the surety, this appeal is taken.

The complaint alleges that the plaintiff is the owner of certain described real property; that she entered into a contract with one Lalor by which she was to receive $5,000 worth of stock of the United States Signal Corporation and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hatton v. HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Oakland Bank of Savings v. MurfeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Overacre v. BlakeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Riverside Portland Cement Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920
  5. Brown v. RivesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Butler v. OlshanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
  2. Clovis Finance Company v. SidesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Stapp v. MarshburnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. Greeninger v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Hope v. VictorMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API