Legal Opinion

Watson v. Taylor

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 15, 1913No. 1264PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error from District Court, Canadian County; John J. Carney, Judge. Action by Marietta Taylor, by her next friend, E. E. Taylor, against H. E. Watson. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.

This was a civil action for damages, commenced by the plaintiff, Marietta Taylor, by her next friend, E. E. Taylor, for a rape committed upon her by the defendant, H. F. Watson. Upon trial to a jury there was a verdict for the plaintiff, upon which judgment was duly entered, to reverse which this proceeding in error was commenced. For convenience the parties hereafter will be called plaintiff and defendant, respectively, as they appeared in the court below.

The evidence of the plaintiff was to the effect that she was an unmarried female, seventeen years of age, of chaste character previous to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. . O'SullivanNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Herbert v. WaggSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Kaufman v. BoismierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. State v. DanforthSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1905
  5. Dean v. . RapleeNew York Court of Appeals · 1895

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Collier v. StamatisArizona Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Parsons v. ParkerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1933
  3. Johnson v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  4. Pine Belt Lumber Co. v. RiggsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  5. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. RichersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API