Legal Opinion
Schuett Investment Co. v. Anderson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 22, 1986No. CX-85-1367PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIERENGARTEN, Judge.
Schuett Investment Company (Schuett) brought an unlawful detainer action against Donna Anderson after Schuett terminated Anderson’s lease “for cause.” Schuett claimed that Anderson’s failure to remedy fire code violations provided good cause to terminate the lease. The trial court denied Schuett a writ of restitution, finding that Anderson was a handicapped individual within the meaning of 29 U.S. C.A. § 794 residing in federally subsidized housing, and that Schuett failed to reasonably accommodate her when it requested that she remedy the fire code violations.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- American Public Transit Association v. Andrew L. Lewis, Jr., Secretary, United States Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Laura Majors v. The Housing Authority of the County of Dekalb GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Ortendahl v. BergmannCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Minneapolis Community Development Agency v. SmallwoodCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Paul McCusker and Associates, Inc. v. OmodtCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jayne G. Nathanson v. The Medical College of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Douglas v. Kriegsfeld Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Josephinium Associates v. KahliCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- Josephinium Associates v. KahliCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- City Wide Associates v. PenfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.