Robidoux v. Munson
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Sherman district court; Charles W. Smith, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Mason, J.:
In a suit brought to foreclose a real-estate mortgage Peter Robidoux, who had possession of the land under a tax deed, was made a defendant. His deed was set aside and he prosecutes error. He first complains of the refusal of the trial court to permit him to interpose the statute of limitations as a defense to the mortgage. It has been repeatedly decided by this court that one not in privity with the maker of a mortgage cannot avail himself of that plea against it. (Ordway v. Cowles, 45 Kan. 447, 25 Pac. 862; Trust Co. v. Parker, 65 Kan. 819,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ordway v. CowlesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
- Lincoln Mortgage & Trust Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
- Bare v. FordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
3Cited by8 opinions
- Carstens v. McLeanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
- Neiswanger v. OrdSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
- Gibson v. AstSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
- Finn v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
- Case v. FrahmSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.