Legal Opinion

Robidoux v. Munson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 9, 1907No. 14,880PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from Sherman district court; Charles W. Smith, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:

In a suit brought to foreclose a real-estate mortgage Peter Robidoux, who had possession of the land under a tax deed, was made a defendant. His deed was set aside and he prosecutes error. He first complains of the refusal of the trial court to permit him to interpose the statute of limitations as a defense to the mortgage. It has been repeatedly decided by this court that one not in privity with the maker of a mortgage cannot avail himself of that plea against it. (Ordway v. Cowles, 45 Kan. 447, 25 Pac. 862; Trust Co. v. Parker, 65 Kan. 819,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ordway v. CowlesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
  2. Lincoln Mortgage & Trust Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  3. Bare v. FordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Carstens v. McLeanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
  2. Neiswanger v. OrdSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  3. Gibson v. AstSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  4. Finn v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  5. Case v. FrahmSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API