Legal Opinion
Carstens v. McLean
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 3, 1925No. 4578PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERT, Circuit Judge.
The appellants presented a claim against the bankrupt’s estate, which was allowed in the sum of $898.48, whereas they contend that it should have been allowed in the sum of $7,-616.70. The referee reduced the claim by disallowing (1) the item of $1,384.73 for the Commercial Waterway District -No. 1 assessment for 1919 against the property which the appellants had leased to the bankrupt; (2) by offsetting against the claim the sum of $2,841.75, the amount paid by the bankrupt for .such waterway district assessments for the years 1917 and 1918; and (3) by offsetting…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Illinois Central Railroad v. DecaturSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Alvord v. BanfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1917
- Crenshaw v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1912
- Olive v. TylerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1919
- Chicago Great Western Railway Co. v. Kansas City Northwestern RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re Braniff Airways, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 1984
- In Re Standard Furniture Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 1980
- Security Building & Loan Ass'n v. SpurlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
- Wingert v. President Directors and Co. of Hagerstown BankCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930
- Sline Properties, Inc. v. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1951
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.