Legal Opinion

Neiswanger v. Ord

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 6, 1909No. 15,988PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Finney district, court; William H. Thompson, judge.-

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:

An action to foreclose a real-estate mortgage executed to John D. Knox & Co., a partnership composed of John D. and Mary Knox, was brought by W. A. Neiswanger, an assignee of the firm. Thomas Ord and Charles H. Swope defended on the ground that they held under a tax deed which was good upon its face and had been of record for more than five years, and also under a decree quieting title against the mortgagees. The trial court held that the tax deed was invalid upon its face and that the decree was void. This proceeding is brought to’ review…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Frank v. TatumTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Proprietors of the Mexican Mill v. Yellow Jacket Silver Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Fowler & Wild v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  4. James Reid & Co. v. McLeodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1852
  5. C. H. Conrades & Co. v. SpinkMissouri Court of Appeals · 1889

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gaynes v. WallingfordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  2. N. A. Kennedy Butter Tub Co. v. First & Hamilton National Bank of Fort WayneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  3. Harris v. United States Mexico Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  4. Yarbrough v. PughWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Campbell v. BohanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API