Legal Opinion

Miller v. Elliott

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1849PublishedCited by 5 opinions

ERROR to the Franklin Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Blackford, J. —

Elliott sued Miller in an action of debt on a bond, dated in May, 1842, for the payment of 1,000 dollars.

The declaration sets out the condition of the bond and assigns breaches. The condition, as shown on oyer, is as follows: “The condition of this obligation is such, that whereas the said James H. Elliott has this day purchased of the said Michael F. Miller, his real property, situate in the town of Fairfield, Indiana, being his residence and lots on which the same is situate, for the purpose of locating himself in the town of Fairfield aforesaid to practice medicine, surgery,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Russell v. BranhamIndiana Supreme Court · 1846
  2. Trimble v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1837
  3. Hamilton v. OvertonIndiana Supreme Court · 1842
  4. Woodruff v. DobbinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1845
  5. State ex rel. Harsh v. ScottIndiana Supreme Court · 1842

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Merica v. BurgetIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
  2. Perry v. WoodberrySupreme Court of Florida · 1890
  3. Coeur D'Alenes Lead Co. v. KingsburyIdaho Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Hannah v. CollinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Menaugh v. ChandlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API