Legal Opinion

United States v. Bustamante-Conchas

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 8, 2016No. 15-2025PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TYMKOVICH, Chief Judge.

Miguel Bustamante-Conchas was convicted on drug distribution charges and sentenced to 240 months in prison. At sentencing the district court found that Busta-mante-Conchas was responsible for a significant amount of drugs and for a firearm in the possession of a co-conspirator, and then after a lengthy hearing sentenced him before he could speak on his behalf to the court. He challenges on appeal the district court’s factual findings at sentencing, as well as the court’s failure to allow him to allocute before sentencing.

We conclude the factual findings are supported by…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Richison v. Ernest Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  3. United States v. Michael Anthony AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  4. United States v. ReynaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  5. United States v. RomeroCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Bustamante-ConchasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
  2. United States v. BranchCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  3. United States v. Bustamante-ConchasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
  4. United States v. Bustamante-ConchasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API