Legal Opinion

Lykins Oil Co. v. Pritchard

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 6, 2006No. C-050982PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sylvia S. Hendon, Judge.

{¶ 1} This appeal concerns the disfavored, albeit legal, action known as a cognovit judgment.

{¶ 2} Defendants-appellants, Roger and William Pritchard, have appealed from the trial court’s denial of their Civ.R. 60(B) motion for relief from the cognovit judgment obtained against them by plaintiff-appellee, Lykins Oil Company.

{¶ 8} Because the Pritchards were entitled to relief from the cognovit judgment, we reverse the decision of the trial court.

The Cognovit Provision

{¶ 4} The Pritchards were part owners of Decatur Commons, a limited liability company. Decatur Commons…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. GTE Automatic Electric, Inc. v. ARC Industries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Rose Chevrolet, Inc. v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Strack v. PeltonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. First Natl. Bank of Pandora v. Freed, Unpublished Decision (7-6-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Bates v. Midland Title of Ashtabula Co., Unpublished Decision (11-26-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Stojkoski v. Main 271 S., L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Baker Motors, Inc. v. Baker Motors Towing, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Merchants Bank & Trust Co. v. Five Star Financial Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Onda, LaBuhn, Rankin & Boggs Co., L.P.A. v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Export-Import Bank v. Advanced Polymer Sciences, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API