Legal Opinion

Onda, LaBuhn, Rankin & Boggs Co., L.P.A. v. Johnson

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 4, 2009No. 08CA16PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McFarland, Judge.

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Stephen B. Johnson, appeals the decision of the Pickaway County Court of Common Pleas denying his Civ.R. 60(B) motion for relief from judgment. Appellant argues that the trial court erred in that (1) the amount owed on the cognovit note cannot be determined solely by reading the note, (2) the confession of judgment is invalid because it impermissibly involves a consumer transaction, and (3) the confession of judgment is an unethical attorney-client fee agreement. Because the cognovit note was facially insufficient to support the cognovit judgment,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pratts v. HurleyOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Patton v. DiemerOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. United States v. Charles Lester VannessCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  4. State v. SwigerOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Lykins Oil Co. v. PritchardOhio Court of Appeals · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fifth Third Bank, N.A. v. Maple Leaf Expansion, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. PC Surveillance.Net, L.L.C. v. Rika Group, Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Merchants Bank & Trust Co. v. Five Star Financial Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Century Natl. Bank v. GwinnOhio Court of Appeals · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API