Legal Opinion

Harpham Bros. v. Perry

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 9, 1925No. 25,766PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

The plaintiff corporation brought this action to enforce the provisions of the bulk-sales act against the defendants.

The facts were these:

One Hallenbeck owned a |7,000 stock of merchandise at McDonald in Rawlins county. In January, 1921, Hallenbeck sold and defendant Perry bought this stock of goods without compliance with the bulk-sales law. Hallenbeck owed plaintiff $1,234.84 on account and a large aggregate sum to other creditors. Perry conducted the Hallenbeck business for several months, selling about $4,000 worth of the goods at…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Oregon Mill & Grain Co. v. HydeOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Long v. ClarkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  3. Welsbach Street Lighting Co. v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  4. Niotaze State Bank v. CooperSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  5. Whitehouse v. NelsonWashington Supreme Court · 1906

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Proctor Trust Co. v. NeihartSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  2. Nelson v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  3. Johnson v. DumondSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  4. Kansas Wheat Growers Ass'n v. Farmers Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  5. Bank of Palmer v. HaleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API