Whitehouse v. Nelson
Washington Supreme Court
Ap;p|eal from a judgment of tie superior court for Spokane county, Huneke, I., entered September 26, 1905, upon findings in favor of a garnisbee defendant, after a bearing on tbe merits, dismissing a garnishment proceeding.
1Opinion of the CourtBudkin, J.
For some time prior to' the 28th day of August, 1903, the plaintiff, Whitehouse, and one Nelson were copartners doing business in the city of Spokane under the firm name of Whitehouse & Nelson. On the 26th day of May, 1902, Nelson executed his promissory note in favor of Whitehouse for the sum of $201.50, payable ninety days after date; and on the 30th day of March, 1903, two additional promissory notes for the sums of $500 and $75, respectively, the former payable sixty days after date, and the latter ninety days after date. On the 28th day of August, 1903, the copartnership therefore…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State ex rel. Whitehouse v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- Whitehouse v. Nelson Dry Goods Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
3Cited by9 opinions
- First Bank of Texola v. TerrellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Mahoney-Jones Co. v. Sams Bros.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1913
- Harpham Bros. v. PerrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
- Castleman v. StrykerOregon Supreme Court · 1923
- Citizens Trust Co. of Binghamton v. MerselisNew York Supreme Court · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.