Niotaze State Bank v. Cooper

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The action was one of replevin, brought by a chattel mortgagee, to obtain possession of - property covered by the mortgage. The plaintiff prevailed and the defendants. appeal.

- The defense of W. 0. Cooper was that the note secured by the chattel mortgage had been paid. The defenses of Lou Cooper were, first, that the debt secured by mortgage had been' paid, and second, that she was the Owner of the property, that she signed the note secured by the mortgage and the mortgage as surety for her husband, W. 0. Cooper, and that . she and her…