Legal Opinion

Campbell Farms v. Wald

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1998No. Civil 970220PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MESCHKE, Justice.

[¶ 1] Andrew Wald appealed a judgment for Campbell Farms, Faulkner Farms, and Empire Cattle Co. (the Buyers) against Wald awarding damages and refund of the purchase price of an immature Simmental bull. We conclude the trial court should not have ordered partial summary judgment for the price of the bull, and we reverse and remand.

[¶ 2] On February 5, 1994, the Buyers bought Hero, a ten-month-old Simmental bull, for $14,506.50 from Wald, who has been raising cattle for over 40 years. Wald’s brochure for the sale of his bulls, including Hero, at Kist Livestock in Mandan…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hougum v. Valley Memorial HomesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. CaiazzoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Hager v. Devils Lake Public School DistrictNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Tong v. BorstadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Marine Mart, Inc. v. PearceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Farmers Union Oil Co. of Garrison v. SmetanaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Heng v. Rotech Medical Corp.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Smith Enterprises, Inc. v. In-Touch Phone Cards, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  4. RGJ Associates, Inc. v. Stainsafe, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
  5. Trans-Tec Asia v. M/V HARMONY CONTAINERDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API