Legal Opinion
Hougum v. Valley Memorial Homes
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided January 27, 1998No. Civil 970108PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
. NEUMANN, Justice.
[¶ 1] Daniel Hougum appealed from a summary judgment dismissing his action against Valley Memorial Homes (VMH), Sears Inc., and Shane Moran. We hold Hougum failed to raise disputed factual issues to support his claim against Moran and Sears for intrusion upon seclusion. We also hold Hougum raised disputed factual issues about whether VMH terminated him for lawful activity off its premises in violation of the North Dakota Human Rights Act. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.
*815I
[¶2] On December 16, 1994, Moran, a Sears loss prevention…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Kjerstad v. Ravellette Publications, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Soentgen v. Quain & Ramstad Clinic, P.C.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Bailer v. Erie Insurance ExchangeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Snakenberg v. Hartford Casualty Ins. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989
- Kummer v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- West v. Media General Convergence, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2001
- Fisher v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Anderson v. Meyer Broadcasting Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Swarthout v. Mutual Service Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Jose v. Norwest Bank North Dakota, N.A.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.