Legal Opinion

Currie v. Matesanz

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided February 19, 2002No. 01-1108PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIPEZ, Circuit Judge.

This case requires us to determine whether an application for state post-conviction relief was “pending” for purposes of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (“AEDPA”). Under AEDPA, state prisoners seeking federal habeas corpus review generally must file a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 within one year of the date on which their state convictions became final. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1). Before pursuing relief in the federal courts, however, state prisoners first must exhaust all available state post-conviction remedies. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(1).…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Artuz v. BennettSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Gibson v. KlingerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Soto v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Foxworth v. St. AmandCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
  3. Steven J. Nowaczyk v. Warden, New Hampshire State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  4. Riva v. FiccoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
  5. Drew v. MacEachernCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API