Legal Opinion
Fidelity & Columbia Trust Co. v. Louisville Railway Co.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided April 23, 1935PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Judge Rees
Affirming.
This action was brought under the Declaratory Judgment Act (Civil Code Prac. secs. 639a-1 to 639a-12) by tbe Louisville Railway Company to test the validity of a proposed refinancing plan whereby it will pay at maturity, on July 1, 1935, $1,000,000 of its first mortgage bonds and, with the consent of the owners, extend the maturity of the remaining $2,000,000 of those bonds to January 1, 1940.
The railway company has outstanding three classes of bonds, referred to in the record as first mortgage bonds, second mortgage bonds, and general mortgage…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Moers v. City of ReadingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1853
- Arnot v. . Union Salt Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906
- First National Bank of Sheridan v. Citizens' State Bank of DubuqueWyoming Supreme Court · 1902
- Claflin v. South Carolina R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina · 1880
- Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Brooklyn Rapid Transit Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1923
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- City of Grand Junction v. Ute Water Conservancy DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- Guleserian v. FieldsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1966
- Wilmington Sav. Fund Soc'y, FSB v. Iheartcommunications, Inc. (In re Iheartmedia, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2019
- Fidelity & Columbia Trust Co. v. Louisville Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
- Guleserian v. FieldsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1966