Legal Opinion

People v. Cobb

California Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 2010No. S159410PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CORRIGAN, J.

Having served his sentence for assault with a deadly weapon, defendant Roy Cobb, Jr., was committed in 2005 to a state hospital for treatment as a mentally disordered offender (MDO). After that commitment ended, a jury found that his condition persisted, and his commitment was extended in this proceeding.1 On appeal, defendant contended he was denied due process because he remained confined while his extension trial was continued, without good cause, beyond his scheduled release date.

As we will explain, several issues presented here have been effectively resolved in the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. California Correctional Peace Officers Ass'n. v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Murillo v. Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1998
  4. In Re Roger S.California Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Edwards v. SteeleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Riverside County Sheriff's Department v. StiglitzCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Lopez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  3. People v. GoodrichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  4. People v. Pipkin, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  5. Riverside County Sheriff's Department v. StiglitzCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API