Legal Opinion

Futscher v. City of Rulo

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1922No. 22371PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Richardson county: John B. Raper, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtFlansburg, J.

This was an action to enjoin the city of Rulo from entering into a contract for the purchase and installation of water-mains, fire hydrants and a standpipe, and from levying the cost thereof as a special assessment against the property in the district claimed to be especially benefited by such improvement. The trial court granted a permanent injunction, and the defendant has ■ appealed.

The defendant city of Rulo is a city of the second class, and its authority to act in the matter involved is based upon certain provisions of section 5119, Rev. St. 1913.

*523This section of the statute was amended…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Hutchinson v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Pomroy v. Board of Public Water WorksSupreme Court of Colorado · 1913
  4. Wickliffe v. City of GreenvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  5. Village of Morgan Park v. WiswallIllinois Supreme Court · 1895

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. City of Omaha v. Board of County CommissionersNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Michelson v. City of Grand IslandNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Matzke v. City of SewardNebraska Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Baxter v. Van HouterOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Cullingham v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API