Legal Opinion

Wickliffe v. City of Greenville

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 1, 1916PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from Muhlenberg Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Chief Justice Miller.

Beversing.

At an election held in the city of Greenville, a city of the fifth class, on November 2nd, 1915, more than two-thirds of the voters thereof authorized the city council to issue bonds to the amount of $22,400.00 for the purpose *530of rebuilding and reconstructing the public streets of tbe city. Bonds to that amount were duly issued and sold for more than their par value, and the proceeds thereof were •paid into the treasury of the city.

On April 3rd, 1916, the city council adopted an ordinance entitled “An ordinance to assist in. the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Levi v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1895
  2. Zable v. Louisville Baptist Orphans' HomeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1891
  3. Williams v. WeddingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  4. Gosnell v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1898
  5. Holzhauer v. City of NewportCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1893

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Klemm v. DavenportSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  2. County of Fresno v. MalmstromCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  3. Shaver v. Rice, MayorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
  4. City of Tompkinsville v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  5. Futscher v. City of RuloNebraska Supreme Court · 1922

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API