Legal Opinion

Spaulding v. Concord General Mutual Insurance

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 9, 1982No. 81-281PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBatchelder, J.

This case involves the question of whether the defendant-insurer’s policy with the plaintiff covers the vehicle that the plaintiff was driving at the time of an accident. Upon the Master’s (Charles T. Gallagher, Esq.) recommendation, the Superior Court (Johnson, J.) found that there was no coverage under the policy. We affirm.

The plaintiff, Gary M. Spaulding, at the time in question, had an insurance policy with Concord General Mutual Insurance Company (Concord General) covering a 1973 Opel. On October 5, 1979, while driving a 1966 Ford Econoline van, the plaintiff collided with a parked…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Moore v. New Hampshire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  2. Exeter Banking Co. v. New Hampshire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
  3. Strozewski v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Green v. DawsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Vermont Mutual Insurance v. MalcolmSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
  2. Niedzielski v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
  3. Foster v. JohnstoneIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Brien Volpe v. Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
  5. Smith v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API